Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mark Feld, post: 623384, member: 11467&quot;]From NGC&#039;s website:</p><p><br /></p><p>NGC &quot;No Grade&quot; Coin Types</p><p><br /></p><p>Unnatural Coloration</p><p>Mechanical Damage</p><p>Environmental Damage</p><p>PVC Contamination</p><p>Improper Cleaning</p><p>Mechanical Repairs</p><p>Counterfeits</p><p>Altered Surfaces</p><p>Mint-Made Flaws</p><p>Non-Eligible Types</p><p><br /></p><p>Conspicuously absent from the above list (quotes taken from JC as the reason(s) NGC supposedly rejected the coin):</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot; uglyness of the fields&quot;</p><p>&quot; unattractive fields&quot;</p><p>&quot;ulgly toning unattractive fields&quot;</p><p>&quot;unattractive fields which was stated the toning of the coin poor eye apeal&quot;</p><p>&quot;unattarctive fields due to extreme bad eye apeal ugly fields&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>And I will repeat one last time....Body-bagging a coin for a problem does not equate with grading an ugly VF coin, VG.</p><p><br /></p><p>This will be my last post to this thread folks. Enjoy the remainder of this pointless debate without me.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in