Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;LostDutchman, post: 623282, member: 16994&quot;]I (and others) have explained it, my explanation is that either: </p><p><br /></p><p>A. Your making the whole thing up. Which I don&#039;t know why you would do that. (I&#039;m giving you the benefit of the doubt there Joe)</p><p><br /></p><p>B. Are confused by what NGC told you. </p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;unattarctive fields due to extreme bad eye apeal ugly fields&quot; Sounds like a Joe term and not an NGC term to me.&nbsp; &nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>You say that that is my opinion. That is not just my opinion, but the opinion of every major dealer and grader that I have ever met.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The original coin has some unattractive toning that was most likely caused by storage in a folder type album. It is ugly, but you know what else? It is original, It means that this coin hasn&#039;t been cleaned any time recently, it also means that it was stored in one location for quite some time. Back to my original point... you don&#039;t like it? Fine don&#039;t buy it... but don&#039;t trash it either.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in