Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
July 4th Quiz #4
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 24637507, member: 24314"]jeffB, asked:</p><p><br /></p><p>1) Are these flecks really "copper colored"? [<span style="color: #ff0000"><i>Take a look at the edge of a BU 2023 25c and uou'll see their actual color.</i></span>]The color balance on the original photo makes the coin look almost like brass or bronze. When I try to correct it so that the main body of the coin is neutral (as I'm assuming a dime would be), I get this:</p><p>Those flecks look a lot less coppery in what I <i>think</i> is a more natural color balance. But, of course, I didn't see the original coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>2) What leads you to believe that these flecks originated at the Mint? My first <b><i>assumption</i></b> was "pocket or cup debris", and without knowing more about the coin's provenance, I find that a <i>lot</i> more plausible than "metal flakes deposited at the Mint". [<i><span style="color: #ff0000">The press floor at the Mint was a dirty place. The coin preses were filthy. This was in the 1970's. Imagine how it was at the turn of the century forward to the forties! I'll post an image of the crap that gets on to coins from the minting process. I imagine this modern example of Mint "gunk" results when clad coins are forced out of a collar</span></i>.]</p><p><br /></p><p>Whatever they are, it looks like the flecks are <i>casting shadows</i>, so they must have landed on the coin <i>after</i> it was struck [<b><i><span style="color: #ff0000">YES!!</span></i></b>](they don't look like any sort of lamination, especially not being a different color from the underlying metal). Were they easily dislodged? [<i><span style="color: #ff0000">Yes</span></i>]If not -- if they were "sticky" [<span style="color: #ff0000"><i>They were sticky and we left them on the coin as it makes the coin more interesting</i></span>] -- that makes it seem even <i>less</i> likely that they're metal flakes from a Mint mishap. Doesn't it? [<i><span style="color: #ff0000">Probably from the normal minting process. The fact that the coin is an error that did notfill the die chamber helped caused this deposit is my guess.</span></i>]</p><p><br /></p><p>rte, posted: OK. Yes 80x microscope is better than 5x cheater glasses.</p><p>BUT, first thing you do is look at the GIA certificate. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie7" alt=":p" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Second a 10x/20x loupe would do.</p><p>That's all the people who certify said diamond used when I got to go diamond hunting <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie47" alt=":greedy:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>After all what good is a laser inscribed diamond without a certificate? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><i><span style="color: #ff0000">...AND COIN GRADING STANDARDS HAVE CHANGED. a large majority of Top TPGS coins in slabs from the 1980's have upgraded. What happens when the GIA decides a diamond will need to be flawless at 20X to get the flawless grade? Don't come <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie23" alt=":bigtears:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> whinning to me when the diamond I picked out of the group was</span></i></p><p><i><span style="color: #ff0000">flawless AT 50X! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie7" alt=":p" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></span></i></p><p><br /></p><p>As far as coins, a 10x loupe is good enough... anything else is overdone.</p><p>My opinion if you can't see it clearly with 10x, the value of the coin does change.</p><p><br /></p><p>You are welcome to use any tool you wish to look at coins. Most professionals in a grading room use 10X or lower and much of the time their eyes alone. That's why l enjoy being able to help long-time professional graders when they ask me for an opinion several times a week about somethig they just are not quite sure of with their 10X glass. I'm able to give a very fast answer because I've always had a stereo scope on my desk <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie57" alt=":jawdrop:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> to examine coins at every place I've worked for over fifty years. I like to see everything there is to see <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie99" alt=":watching:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> on a coin before I view it at 7X. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 24637507, member: 24314"]jeffB, asked: 1) Are these flecks really "copper colored"? [[COLOR=#ff0000][I]Take a look at the edge of a BU 2023 25c and uou'll see their actual color.[/I][/COLOR]]The color balance on the original photo makes the coin look almost like brass or bronze. When I try to correct it so that the main body of the coin is neutral (as I'm assuming a dime would be), I get this: Those flecks look a lot less coppery in what I [I]think[/I] is a more natural color balance. But, of course, I didn't see the original coin. 2) What leads you to believe that these flecks originated at the Mint? My first [B][I]assumption[/I][/B] was "pocket or cup debris", and without knowing more about the coin's provenance, I find that a [I]lot[/I] more plausible than "metal flakes deposited at the Mint". [[I][COLOR=#ff0000]The press floor at the Mint was a dirty place. The coin preses were filthy. This was in the 1970's. Imagine how it was at the turn of the century forward to the forties! I'll post an image of the crap that gets on to coins from the minting process. I imagine this modern example of Mint "gunk" results when clad coins are forced out of a collar[/COLOR][/I].] Whatever they are, it looks like the flecks are [I]casting shadows[/I], so they must have landed on the coin [I]after[/I] it was struck [[B][I][COLOR=#ff0000]YES!![/COLOR][/I][/B]](they don't look like any sort of lamination, especially not being a different color from the underlying metal). Were they easily dislodged? [[I][COLOR=#ff0000]Yes[/COLOR][/I]]If not -- if they were "sticky" [[COLOR=#ff0000][I]They were sticky and we left them on the coin as it makes the coin more interesting[/I][/COLOR]] -- that makes it seem even [I]less[/I] likely that they're metal flakes from a Mint mishap. Doesn't it? [[I][COLOR=#ff0000]Probably from the normal minting process. The fact that the coin is an error that did notfill the die chamber helped caused this deposit is my guess.[/COLOR][/I]] rte, posted: OK. Yes 80x microscope is better than 5x cheater glasses. BUT, first thing you do is look at the GIA certificate. :p Second a 10x/20x loupe would do. That's all the people who certify said diamond used when I got to go diamond hunting :greedy: After all what good is a laser inscribed diamond without a certificate? :D [I][COLOR=#ff0000]...AND COIN GRADING STANDARDS HAVE CHANGED. a large majority of Top TPGS coins in slabs from the 1980's have upgraded. What happens when the GIA decides a diamond will need to be flawless at 20X to get the flawless grade? Don't come :bigtears: whinning to me when the diamond I picked out of the group was flawless AT 50X! :D:p[/COLOR][/I] As far as coins, a 10x loupe is good enough... anything else is overdone. My opinion if you can't see it clearly with 10x, the value of the coin does change. You are welcome to use any tool you wish to look at coins. Most professionals in a grading room use 10X or lower and much of the time their eyes alone. That's why l enjoy being able to help long-time professional graders when they ask me for an opinion several times a week about somethig they just are not quite sure of with their 10X glass. I'm able to give a very fast answer because I've always had a stereo scope on my desk :jawdrop: to examine coins at every place I've worked for over fifty years. I like to see everything there is to see :watching: on a coin before I view it at 7X. :D[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
July 4th Quiz #4
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...