Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Julius Caesar and Octavian AE19 Genuine?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Blake Davis, post: 26562815, member: 91820"]Thanks to all for the comments - the inscription is Nicea - but I cannot find anything from Nicea that looks remotely like this. The group of coins cost about $150 - this was one of about six. I cannot believe that a European auction company like Numismatik Naumann would sell a coin of Julius Caesar and Augustus in this condition even from a provincial mint as part of a group lot. If we accept that this is genuine what would any coin with portraits of Julius Caesar and Augustus that look like this go for? Quite a bit is my guess even if it is provincial. </p><p><br /></p><p>I learned long ago that European auction houses generally do a good job of weeding out individual valuable coins in group lots - the one exception a year ago I did find a very rare small bronze coin from an Italian city in a group lot - that one coin more than paid for a group - but that was once in two decades. And it was an oddity - an arm holding a knife - I forget the city - took quite awhile to ID it. Someone from the city in Italy purchased it and boy was he really happy since the coin is extremely rare - but not in my collecting interest. I'll look it up and post the name of the city. Actually I just found a coin of Severus II in one of the NN group lots - condition, not so good. But it is only the second coin of his I have come across in 26 years.</p><p><br /></p><p>Nevertheless I would love to know more about the coin I posted. Early in my collecting ancients, I helped sell a friend's collection of about 300 coins on ebay - he had inherited it from his uncle who allegedly brought the coins home from WW2. The collection included some realistic looking fakes. The answer from experienced collectors and sellers was that "that coin could not have been struck in antiquity." I feel the same way about this coin - it looks genuine, although would a provincial mint use thin lettering that was used in Rome and that is inconsistent with the other Nicean coin struck for Julius Caesar? Also the portrait style is of the Rome mint but the other coin of Julius Caesar that we know was struck in Nicea looks nothing like this. Unless I am wrong about the attribution but the lettering - I think NIKE etc. is of Nicea.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Blake Davis, post: 26562815, member: 91820"]Thanks to all for the comments - the inscription is Nicea - but I cannot find anything from Nicea that looks remotely like this. The group of coins cost about $150 - this was one of about six. I cannot believe that a European auction company like Numismatik Naumann would sell a coin of Julius Caesar and Augustus in this condition even from a provincial mint as part of a group lot. If we accept that this is genuine what would any coin with portraits of Julius Caesar and Augustus that look like this go for? Quite a bit is my guess even if it is provincial. I learned long ago that European auction houses generally do a good job of weeding out individual valuable coins in group lots - the one exception a year ago I did find a very rare small bronze coin from an Italian city in a group lot - that one coin more than paid for a group - but that was once in two decades. And it was an oddity - an arm holding a knife - I forget the city - took quite awhile to ID it. Someone from the city in Italy purchased it and boy was he really happy since the coin is extremely rare - but not in my collecting interest. I'll look it up and post the name of the city. Actually I just found a coin of Severus II in one of the NN group lots - condition, not so good. But it is only the second coin of his I have come across in 26 years. Nevertheless I would love to know more about the coin I posted. Early in my collecting ancients, I helped sell a friend's collection of about 300 coins on ebay - he had inherited it from his uncle who allegedly brought the coins home from WW2. The collection included some realistic looking fakes. The answer from experienced collectors and sellers was that "that coin could not have been struck in antiquity." I feel the same way about this coin - it looks genuine, although would a provincial mint use thin lettering that was used in Rome and that is inconsistent with the other Nicean coin struck for Julius Caesar? Also the portrait style is of the Rome mint but the other coin of Julius Caesar that we know was struck in Nicea looks nothing like this. Unless I am wrong about the attribution but the lettering - I think NIKE etc. is of Nicea.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Julius Caesar and Octavian AE19 Genuine?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...