Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Judaea Capta Corrected!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 8290229, member: 19463"]I works the other way also. In fact, some sellers make the assumption that anything hard to ID properly must be the expensive one. The obverse of this AE28 of Diocaesarea, Cilicia, clearly reads ANNIA ΦAVCTINA but the portrait should have made it obvious that we were dealing with the first lady of that name whom we call Faustina II but could just as well been labeled Annia Faustina (since that was her name) potentially making her great granddaughter (the more expensive wife of Elagabalus) "Annia Faustina II". I bought this one in 1998 correctly identified but I have seen the type since 'upgraded' through misidentification based on the 1993 catalog of the French National Collection. The correct ID is now universal with the sort of dealers we all should be favoring but you may find the mistake still from the flea market crowd and dreamers.</p><p>Note several listings from acsearch that includes reference to the incorrect ID "SNG BN 874-5 (as Annia Faustina)". I find it interesting that a few of these dealers quote the reference but omit mention of the error. </p><p><a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=annia+diocaesarea&category=1-2&lot=&thesaurus=1&images=1&en=1&de=1&fr=1&it=1&es=1&ot=1&currency=usd&order=0" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=annia+diocaesarea&category=1-2&lot=&thesaurus=1&images=1&en=1&de=1&fr=1&it=1&es=1&ot=1&currency=usd&order=0" rel="nofollow">https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=annia+diocaesarea&category=1-2&lot=&thesaurus=1&images=1&en=1&de=1&fr=1&it=1&es=1&ot=1&currency=usd&order=0</a></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1465328[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Does anyone have this book and could check what the Cilicia volume says about the coin?</p><p><a href="https://bid.numislit.com/lots/view/1-1JZV4J/sng-france-2-5" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://bid.numislit.com/lots/view/1-1JZV4J/sng-france-2-5" rel="nofollow">https://bid.numislit.com/lots/view/1-1JZV4J/sng-france-2-5</a></p><p><br /></p><p>The history of numismatics is filled with misattributions some of which leave us today just wondering what they were thinking. Poster child for this sort of thing has to be the medieval belief that the coins of Rhodes with radiate head of Helios depicted Christ wearing a crown of thorns. I wonder which of our current theories will seem hilarious to scholars of the next century. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1465332[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 8290229, member: 19463"]I works the other way also. In fact, some sellers make the assumption that anything hard to ID properly must be the expensive one. The obverse of this AE28 of Diocaesarea, Cilicia, clearly reads ANNIA ΦAVCTINA but the portrait should have made it obvious that we were dealing with the first lady of that name whom we call Faustina II but could just as well been labeled Annia Faustina (since that was her name) potentially making her great granddaughter (the more expensive wife of Elagabalus) "Annia Faustina II". I bought this one in 1998 correctly identified but I have seen the type since 'upgraded' through misidentification based on the 1993 catalog of the French National Collection. The correct ID is now universal with the sort of dealers we all should be favoring but you may find the mistake still from the flea market crowd and dreamers. Note several listings from acsearch that includes reference to the incorrect ID "SNG BN 874-5 (as Annia Faustina)". I find it interesting that a few of these dealers quote the reference but omit mention of the error. [URL]https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?term=annia+diocaesarea&category=1-2&lot=&thesaurus=1&images=1&en=1&de=1&fr=1&it=1&es=1&ot=1¤cy=usd&order=0[/URL] [ATTACH=full]1465328[/ATTACH] Does anyone have this book and could check what the Cilicia volume says about the coin? [URL]https://bid.numislit.com/lots/view/1-1JZV4J/sng-france-2-5[/URL] The history of numismatics is filled with misattributions some of which leave us today just wondering what they were thinking. Poster child for this sort of thing has to be the medieval belief that the coins of Rhodes with radiate head of Helios depicted Christ wearing a crown of thorns. I wonder which of our current theories will seem hilarious to scholars of the next century. [ATTACH=full]1465332[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Judaea Capta Corrected!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...