Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Jeremy's top 10 of 2020
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 5337837, member: 75937"]All enviable coins, [USER=88227]@jb_depew[/USER]! All of them would be tied for #1 were that my list. I like the facing Gorgoneion and the youth on dolphin of Tarentum, to be sure, but I'm drawn to the Roman ones. I have always like the big chunky first brass coins of Pisidian Antioch and coins depicting the Lupa Romana, so I find your example very captivating. I really like the portrait on that Commodus sestertius, too! The die flaw on the forehead only adds interest because of its technical aspect.</p><p><br /></p><p>But my favorite of all is the Faustina sestertius. That reverse design was introduced between AD 140 and 144,[1] and probably in 143 as part of an issue to commemorate the dedication of the temple to Diva Faustina that year.[2] What I find most interesting about your coin is the ornate nature of the stephane. Typically, the stephane is depicted of a simple lunate design, such as on my example of your sestertius.</p><p> [ATTACH=full]1225895[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>One of the specimens in the British Museum, (BMCRE <a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-12522" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-12522" rel="nofollow">1447</a>, p. 233) has a rather ornate stephane as well, but yours is even more of a stellate, rather than lunate design.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1225897[/ATTACH]</p><p>OP coin for comparison:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1225906[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Your coin comes in several bust varieties: A bare-headed version facing right, (BMCRE <a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-12518" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-12518" rel="nofollow">1442</a>), a veiled bust without a stephane facing right (BMCRE <a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-12521" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-12521" rel="nofollow">1445</a>) or left (Strack 1241 with examples in Munich, Paris and Vienna), and a veiled bust with a stephane facing right (your coin) or left (BMCRE <a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1867-0101-2072" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1867-0101-2072" rel="nofollow">1451</a>). It supposedly comes with a shorter obverse legend (DIVA AVG FAVSTINA), Cohen 243 and 245, cited in RIC as <a href="http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.3.ant.1146Ba" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.3.ant.1146Ba" rel="nofollow">1146Ba</a> and <a href="http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.3.ant.1146Bb" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.3.ant.1146Bb" rel="nofollow">1146Bb</a>, but I haven't been able to confirm the existence of these varieties after a rather exhaustive internet search.</p><p><br /></p><p>The corresponding duponius and denarius with the right-facing veiled bust do not depict the empress wearing the stephane.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1225902[/ATTACH]</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1225903[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>So, that's probably everything you never wanted to know about your coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>~~~</p><p><br /></p><p>1. Pietas sacrificing over a candelabrum appears muled with an aureus of Antoninus Pius bearing the inscription ANTONINVS AVG PIVS PP TR P COS III, establishing a date of AD 140-144 with certainty. See Beckmann, Martin. <i>Diva Faustina: Coinage and Cult in Rome and the Provinces.</i> American Numismatic Society, 2012, p. 7.</p><p><br /></p><p>2. The portrait-type of Faustina wearing a veil with a stephane commences with the DEDICATIO AEDIS ("Dedication of the Temple") type; we know from non-numismatic sources the temple was dedicated in AD 143.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 5337837, member: 75937"]All enviable coins, [USER=88227]@jb_depew[/USER]! All of them would be tied for #1 were that my list. I like the facing Gorgoneion and the youth on dolphin of Tarentum, to be sure, but I'm drawn to the Roman ones. I have always like the big chunky first brass coins of Pisidian Antioch and coins depicting the Lupa Romana, so I find your example very captivating. I really like the portrait on that Commodus sestertius, too! The die flaw on the forehead only adds interest because of its technical aspect. But my favorite of all is the Faustina sestertius. That reverse design was introduced between AD 140 and 144,[1] and probably in 143 as part of an issue to commemorate the dedication of the temple to Diva Faustina that year.[2] What I find most interesting about your coin is the ornate nature of the stephane. Typically, the stephane is depicted of a simple lunate design, such as on my example of your sestertius. [ATTACH=full]1225895[/ATTACH] One of the specimens in the British Museum, (BMCRE [URL='https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-12522']1447[/URL], p. 233) has a rather ornate stephane as well, but yours is even more of a stellate, rather than lunate design. [ATTACH=full]1225897[/ATTACH] OP coin for comparison: [ATTACH=full]1225906[/ATTACH] Your coin comes in several bust varieties: A bare-headed version facing right, (BMCRE [URL='https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-12518']1442[/URL]), a veiled bust without a stephane facing right (BMCRE [URL='https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_R-12521']1445[/URL]) or left (Strack 1241 with examples in Munich, Paris and Vienna), and a veiled bust with a stephane facing right (your coin) or left (BMCRE [URL='https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1867-0101-2072']1451[/URL]). It supposedly comes with a shorter obverse legend (DIVA AVG FAVSTINA), Cohen 243 and 245, cited in RIC as [URL='http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.3.ant.1146Ba']1146Ba[/URL] and [URL='http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.3.ant.1146Bb']1146Bb[/URL], but I haven't been able to confirm the existence of these varieties after a rather exhaustive internet search. The corresponding duponius and denarius with the right-facing veiled bust do not depict the empress wearing the stephane. [ATTACH=full]1225902[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1225903[/ATTACH] So, that's probably everything you never wanted to know about your coin. ~~~ 1. Pietas sacrificing over a candelabrum appears muled with an aureus of Antoninus Pius bearing the inscription ANTONINVS AVG PIVS PP TR P COS III, establishing a date of AD 140-144 with certainty. See Beckmann, Martin. [I]Diva Faustina: Coinage and Cult in Rome and the Provinces.[/I] American Numismatic Society, 2012, p. 7. 2. The portrait-type of Faustina wearing a veil with a stephane commences with the DEDICATIO AEDIS ("Dedication of the Temple") type; we know from non-numismatic sources the temple was dedicated in AD 143.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Jeremy's top 10 of 2020
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...