Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Jefferson Nickel in a Philly Mint Set...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="cladking, post: 8358699, member: 68"]I believe it was partially automated for many years starting at least as early as the late-'50's. Over the years they would have made improvements until it was fully automated in 1980. This is based almost solely on the existence of odds defying Gem sets. Some of the Gems are so scarce for these years that not even one set in 100,000 should be Gem but instead it's far higher. </p><p><br /></p><p>I used to read reports in the numismatic press that the new sets were beautiful and in the same paper another writer would say the coins looked like they were swept off the mint floor. I thought some people are harder to please but Now I think both reports were right.</p><p><br /></p><p>There are processes that cause Gems to bunch up in the successively made or prepared sets but I can imagine no means Gems of various denominations would be packaged together other than through intention. </p><p><br /></p><p>I had a 1968 mint set where each coin was one in a thousand. Even getting a set where every coin is in the 90th %ile is quite improbable. </p><p><br /></p><p>After 1979 there aren't any such packaging anomalies that I've ever seen. Some sets are better than others and some coins are far better than others but there are no odds defying sets; they simply show a natural variation.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="cladking, post: 8358699, member: 68"]I believe it was partially automated for many years starting at least as early as the late-'50's. Over the years they would have made improvements until it was fully automated in 1980. This is based almost solely on the existence of odds defying Gem sets. Some of the Gems are so scarce for these years that not even one set in 100,000 should be Gem but instead it's far higher. I used to read reports in the numismatic press that the new sets were beautiful and in the same paper another writer would say the coins looked like they were swept off the mint floor. I thought some people are harder to please but Now I think both reports were right. There are processes that cause Gems to bunch up in the successively made or prepared sets but I can imagine no means Gems of various denominations would be packaged together other than through intention. I had a 1968 mint set where each coin was one in a thousand. Even getting a set where every coin is in the 90th %ile is quite improbable. After 1979 there aren't any such packaging anomalies that I've ever seen. Some sets are better than others and some coins are far better than others but there are no odds defying sets; they simply show a natural variation.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Jefferson Nickel in a Philly Mint Set...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...