Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;cladking, post: 8355991, member: 68&quot;]I kindda agree about preserving ugly coins and most &#039;69 quarters are very ugly in the mint set and were even uglier in BU rolls back in 1969.&nbsp; I personally believe that only attractive specimens from Poor to Unc are worth saving. About 98% of these made for circulation and 60% of them made for mint sets were ugly the day they were issued.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>However, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and some collectors can find beauty in clad coins that I do not.&nbsp; That there are so few clads also makes me believe that every one that can be saved should be saved. </p><p><br /></p><p>It is sometimes almost impossible to grade a clad through layers of tarnish so I clean them all and usually spend the ones that are still ugly even if all the tarnish comes off.&nbsp; The others, the rare survivor, I put in stable individual holders.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in