Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Jaelus, post: 7851910, member: 46237&quot;]It is more than likely really a 64. Penalizing a coin from a 67 all the way down to a 58 for having just the slightest touch of barely noticable high point wear while an inferior baggy coin gets only few points deducted is a glaring flaw in the grading system. Technical grading is an antiquated practice which has long been replaced by pragmatic common sense market grading.</p><p><br /></p><p>CAC validating a technical grade for a market graded coin is the height of idiocy. Of course the grade doesn&#039;t match when different standards are applied.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in