https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=329645 like my coin, and the font style, text, and the letters are similar or not?
I suggested that it is for the coin, it's the data: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=2410446 http://www.asiaminorcoins.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=270&pid=11096#top_display_media But my opinion is that it is an imitation of the coins of local manufacture or later, or it is a craft shop small small group produced this coin. But from regular samples it differs primitive views as barbaric imitation. I will be glad to know your opinion
I'm still lost on this but I must admit it does resemble the examples of the links you added for Gallienus....
http://www258.pair.com/denarius/cgi-bin/erfind.pl?sstring=antioch+pisidia+tyche+"four+pellets" Mikey Zee you are right, my coin on the coin does not like, but it may have a stylized imitation of the coins of this city and the opportunity to later, and maybe 4 or 5 century, but Galenus like a coin which depicts the city Galenus. That's what made this simulation is not clear?
stevex6 - these coins 2,000 years is a great way of creating human civilization, because they are worthy to do scientific researchers such as you and I know the secret - they identsifikatsiyu and spent it all on only 1 year?
Actually it looks to me to be an coin of Gallienus from the mint of Antioch in Pisidia Here is an image of a similar coin.
The Celts have issued counterfeit coins of Antioch, and my coin is clearly Celtic. CELTIC TRIBES Bronze. Imitating seleukid coinage. 14 mm. 2,88 g. Obv: Laurate celticised head left. Rev: Apollo seated on Omphalos left. VF Rare