Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SRSNUM, post: 8247354, member: 102988&quot;]Yes, I am familiar with the leaf connecting to the stem at a higher junction.&nbsp; The thin date is not indicated in Haffner but has crept in to the dialog and appears to have muddied the waters a bit.</p><p><br /></p><p>Numista mentions:</p><p><br /></p><p>Wide date</p><p><br /></p><p>Thick date</p><p><br /></p><p>No designation- presumably “Regular Date”.</p><p><br /></p><p>All from Kings Norton Mint.</p><p><br /></p><p>No &quot;thin date&quot; mentioned.</p><p><br /></p><p>To illustrate some of the inconsistencies that exist:</p><p>PCGS exhibits 3 images(MS64,MS62,AU55) of Haffner A|-2a Thick Date (Regular Strike)—my borrowed copy of Haffner shows designation ‘Thick Date A-102a.’</p><p><br /></p><p>To my eye, the MS62 &amp; AU55 appear to be the same.&nbsp; However, the MS64 image appears to be a different variety.</p><p><br /></p><p>See images below…there appears to be two <b><i>different</i></b> varieties for the <b><i>same</i></b> “Thick Date” PCGS variety.&nbsp; Which is correct?</p><p><br /></p><p>MS 64 OBVERSE</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1452470[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>MS62 OBVERSE</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1452471[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>MS 64 REVERSE</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1452472[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>MS 62 REVERSE</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1452474[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in