Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jcuve, post: 699728, member: 13945&quot;]I believe that John Wexler initially thought the &#039;83P LCCLO-001 was a product of two obverse dies having a MAD clash - and that could only happen if a Mint employee was fooling around with a press. I think it might have been Ken Potter (or someone else I hope I am not offending) that realized the two &#039;83Ps with extra letters were in fact the product of a Counter Clash. The CPG lists LCCLO-001 as FS 035.3 and it displays a CUD (LC-83-46R). My guess was that this die struck very few coins after being damaged whereas LCCLO-002 struck far more.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in