Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="V. Kurt Bellman, post: 2799586, member: 71723"]All I was "implying", and now I'll state it outright, was that there are MANY coin doctors out there, in fact I believe there are MANY who are silent CT members (not you), and I do NOT subscribe to the "shush, be quiet" school of thought regarding them. I believe the best way to crush their impact on the coin market is to spread the techniques they use as far and wide and loudly as we can, which I shall continue to do. The more people know, the better, and we can shut down this silly fraudulent sector of the coin market. Thassall. BTW, both thoughts were directed to the 1958 Franklin, no? When did you switch back to the 1952? I don't see any way your opinions at post 33 and 35 can be seen as applying to different coins. Both PLAINLY refer to the 1958 Doug pictured. As pertains to digital vs. chemical photography - it's not just apples and oranges, but apples and oak trees.[/QUOTE]