Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;krispy, post: 1477392, member: 19065&quot;]I have explained my thoughts, both that I do not contest the grade of the OP&#039;s note and what I see paper wave to be about. I don&#039;t consider paper wave to be a bad thing until it becomes a factor exacerbated by improper storage and environmental impact on the flat-ness of the note which then may (varies from individual to individual) affect eye appeal, hence value. So you evidently don&#039;t understand what I am point out and talking about, even though I have attempted to explain this repeatedly. I am not contesting how the TPGs mark their labels to address what is &#039;natural&#039; and market acceptable. Up and down, I have stated what it is I am talking about, and it is not about grading, per say. I have addressed all of the points you tried to illuminate by pointing me to the TPGs grading standards, of which I too am (previously) read up on and understand them. I stand by my statements about paper and addressed why the other guys were wrong to put the blame on inks causing wave or in generalizing that collectors desire wavy notes, when there are clearly notes which are not within the standards of collectors eye appeal due to excessive wave (maybe approaching mild environmental &quot;damage&quot;) despite bearing a high grade. I hope you can understand and if you have another question, try to reframe it in this context.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in