Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;cpm9ball, post: 1881527, member: 24633&quot;]Agreed!</p><p><br /></p><p>However, this thread has its own share of absurdities. Read on!</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Silly?</p><p>&gt;Blame it on the bidiots, not the grading services.</p><p><br /></p><p>Incentive?</p><p>&gt;Certainly not for the grading services! They already know how to grade better than most people.</p><p>&gt;Maybe it is for the people, not knowing how to grade, who must rely on the insert rather than an examination of the coin.</p><p>&gt;Nah! It&#039;s probably to let the owner of such a coin know that he/she should submit it to CAC for a gold beanie.</p><p><br /></p><p>Profit?</p><p>&gt;Please explain how the grading services profit, over and above their initial grading fees, from the sale of such a coin.</p><p>&gt;Oh! I know! They receive royalties on every sale, <b><i>in perpetuity!</i></b></p><p><br /></p><p>Overdo it?</p><p>&gt;Right! The grading services wouldn&#039;t want to offend the owners of &quot;solid 64&#039;s&quot; <b>(64.5)</b> thereby precluding them from sending in new business.</p><p><br /></p><p>Perhaps someone should propose an amendment to the U.S. Constitution guaranteeing everyone the right of <b><i>factual freedom of speech</i></b>.</p><p><br /></p><p>Chris[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in