Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;JCro57, post: 3133869, member: 92083&quot;]My understanding is that a coin missing its clad layer, in full or in part, is a form of a lamination error. So just wondering why this is labeled &quot;lamination&quot; rather than &quot;partial missing obverse clad layer?&quot; I feel &quot;lamination errors&quot; should be for non-clad coins, like nickels, cents, and silver/gold coins that are not plated. For clad coins, if any of the copper is exposed, it should be labeled as a full or partial missing clad layer. (Picked this up at an auction last night as part of my missing clad layer/plating issue series.) I also think this coin is heavily overgraded for an MS63 as the reverse looks incredibly worn throughout.</p><p><br /></p><p>Any thoughts or opinions are appreciated.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]799923[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]799924[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]799925[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in