Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Is this IHC a proof?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="physics-fan3.14, post: 4945172, member: 19165"]Can you show us a picture of the rims? </p><p><br /></p><p>There are several things pushing me towards Business Strike for this one: </p><p><br /></p><p>1. mushy dentils</p><p>2. mushy date</p><p>3. mushy shield</p><p><br /></p><p>I would expect these details to be sharp and crisp on a proof. I just compared about 20 proofs on Heritage to your coin, and your coin is definitely weaker in all of those areas compared to the proofs. </p><p><br /></p><p>Additionally, I couldn't find any that exhibited die polish (at least, it wasn't evident in the pictures). The large amounts of apparent die polish on the reverse tend to push me in the direction of "proof die which was then put into service for business strikes." This was fairly common in the late 19th century. </p><p><br /></p><p>The seemingly lustrous nature of the reverse, as opposed to the mirrored finish I expect on a proof, also lends itself to this theory. </p><p><br /></p><p>If there are any unique die markers of a proof, [USER=1765]@messydesk[/USER] will know them. At this point, I don't think its a proof. More pictures or more evidence could change my mind.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="physics-fan3.14, post: 4945172, member: 19165"]Can you show us a picture of the rims? There are several things pushing me towards Business Strike for this one: 1. mushy dentils 2. mushy date 3. mushy shield I would expect these details to be sharp and crisp on a proof. I just compared about 20 proofs on Heritage to your coin, and your coin is definitely weaker in all of those areas compared to the proofs. Additionally, I couldn't find any that exhibited die polish (at least, it wasn't evident in the pictures). The large amounts of apparent die polish on the reverse tend to push me in the direction of "proof die which was then put into service for business strikes." This was fairly common in the late 19th century. The seemingly lustrous nature of the reverse, as opposed to the mirrored finish I expect on a proof, also lends itself to this theory. If there are any unique die markers of a proof, [USER=1765]@messydesk[/USER] will know them. At this point, I don't think its a proof. More pictures or more evidence could change my mind.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Is this IHC a proof?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...