Is this genuine?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by FoundinTN, Dec 2, 2019 at 9:39 PM.

  1. FoundinTN

    FoundinTN Big AM

    MISSING CLAD ,I read up on it a bit.. i cannot confirm or deny that it is legitimate,I need your help.
    It doesn't looks cleaned or anything to me,it appears to have some nice patina as well
    My concerns.....
    1.The weight is spot on,not sure if it should be or not.
    2. I've never seen both sides missing,its usually 1 side or the other.
    20191202_212924.jpg
    20191202_212938.jpg 20191202_213146.jpg 20191202_213237.jpg 20191202_213225.jpg
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2019 at 9:46 PM
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    More like environmental toning IMO.
     
    Oldhoopster and thomas mozzillo like this.
  4. FoundinTN

    FoundinTN Big AM

    Idk,why is it so much thinner than the other?
     
  5. CoinBlazer

    CoinBlazer Professional Teenager

    My Opinion
    NOT missing clad layer
     
    furryfrog02 likes this.
  6. FoundinTN

    FoundinTN Big AM

    It matches the characteristics of every example I've read about and seen so far,may I ask what is the detourant? And what is the explanation for the thin Planchet
     
  7. Amos 811

    Amos 811 DisMember

    and try to re weigh them with something heaver in between the two weights. And the coin prob had a acid bath.
     
  8. FoundinTN

    FoundinTN Big AM

    I have to disagree on the acid bath.
     
  9. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    @cpm9ball show the young padawan here your missing clad layer half ;)
     
  10. FoundinTN

    FoundinTN Big AM

    il_794xN.1997599064_moxo.jpg
    What was the determinating factor here? I'm trying to understand why this wouldnt be considered,it looks alot like a real one.
     
  11. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    This tells you that it is not missing any of the clad layer. The coin is just toned.
     
    Oldhoopster likes this.
  12. Wilddavy

    Wilddavy Active Member

    I found this a few years ago. 1966
     

    Attached Files:

  13. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    Mushy details. Yours has none.
     
  14. FoundinTN

    FoundinTN Big AM

    This article tell me different.
    Screenshot_20191202-221418_Chrome.jpg
     
  15. FoundinTN

    FoundinTN Big AM

    My nikon brings out the richness in color and details,here are normal photos from my phone 20191202_221734.jpg 20191202_221754.jpg 20191202_193321.jpg 20191202_193408.jpg
     
  16. Kevin Mader

    Kevin Mader Fellow Coin Enthusiast

    It may be a thin planchet error, but it doesn't look like a missing clad error to me. I only have a quarter specimen to compare to, but my specimen is uncirculated.
     
  17. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Looks like the coin is toned.
     
  18. FoundinTN

    FoundinTN Big AM

    Wouldnt a toned coin still show atleast a sign of the clad layer on the rim?
     
  19. FoundinTN

    FoundinTN Big AM

    I'm not trying to force the issue here,I'm honestly trying to understand. @Fred Weinberg thoughts
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2019 at 10:40 PM
  20. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    No not necessarily. Have you not looked at quarters and halves before? Sometimes you see more (or less) of the clad layer.
     
  21. FoundinTN

    FoundinTN Big AM

    I have,I am familiar with what it is supposed to look like,this one shows no signs all around it. And is noticeably thinner than the normal dime I am comparing it to
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page