Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;krispy, post: 856073, member: 19065&quot;]You live in your own made up world rejecting reality because you&nbsp; continue to fail to see the <i>terms of the auction</i>, yet insist on&nbsp; your right to change those terms after the fact when, given the&nbsp; situation the OP began this thread with, subscribed to the terms of the&nbsp; agreement by bidding before requesting a change be made in policy. &quot;<i>Should have been able to</i></p><p><i>Meet since they were so close&quot; </i>is not in the terms of the auction nor was it allowed at the Sellers discretion after the fact of the Buyer placing a bid in agreement with said terms.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is not about doing thing differently, this is about the situation&nbsp; as posed by the OP, not your hypothetical scenarios of how others choose&nbsp; to do business or to think. You don&#039;t get an opinion in a binding&nbsp; auction contract, it&#039;s an agreement. The Seller in the OP had every&nbsp; right to decline meeting the Buyer.</p><p><br /></p><p>We are not going around and around Rusty, you clearly fail to understand&nbsp; the principal of the matter at hand and insomuch bring about the misery&nbsp; of the situation yourself because you cannot live with the fact that <i>you&nbsp; do not read fully before you act.</i> Anyone who reads the masses of&nbsp; posts you make in threads could determine this prior to this thread&nbsp; illustrating the point. Take your bow as you choose to now, but I&#039;m sure it&nbsp; won&#039;t be your last doing things in your opinion, differently.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in