Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;-jeffB, post: 2009476, member: 27832&quot;]I never even got that far. Look at the variation in stroke thickness in the digits -- look how the horizontal strokes are much thinner than the vertical strokes on the real examples. Now look how uniform the stroke thickness is on the fake. To me, it looks like the fake&#039;s date was drawn with a crayon.</p><p><br /></p><p>Looking now, I agree that the distance between the 9 and the truncation is off, but I think it&#039;s because all four digits are oversized. Note also how the 1 points to the right of the monogram on the neck in the real examples, but directly at the monogram on the fake.</p><p><br /></p><p>I guess I must be learning, because it took me a while to recognize my own Barber quarter as a fake, but this one (and a few others that have been posted recently) really jumps out at me.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in