Is this an 1873 CC or an 1874 CC??

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by mullah, Sep 4, 2019.

?

1873 or 1874?

  1. 1873

  2. 1874

  3. Neither! too damaged to tell

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. mullah

    mullah Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Legomaster1

    Legomaster1 Cointalk Patron

    I would refrain from buying that coin. It looks cull, and there's no point in paying $142 for a coin with an indiscernible year. It could also be an 1850s Seated Half judging by the third numeral.
     
  4. Nathan401

    Nathan401 Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Supporter

    Worth melt value to me.
     
  5. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Date is illegible. Therefore it's not worth much... and certainly not worth that much.
     
  6. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    In that condition it's not worth the current price. It's a cull coin with no date. I doubt it would grade P-01.
     
  7. C-B-D

    C-B-D U.S. Type Coins or death!

    That guy has been peddling trash coins for a loooong long time on eBay. And people buy them all the time! I'm always flabbergasted.
     
  8. Lawtoad

    Lawtoad Well-Known Member

    Carson City did not start coin production until 1870. I agree that this is a cull coin. Cool CC mint mark but not worth $142
     
  9. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random nobody...

    It has arrows, a motto on the reverse, and a CC mintmark. It HAS to be either 1873 or 1874. I see 1873.

    I will buy all you have for melt. Can we stop with these unrealistic valuations?

    61C9FFAA-A451-48AA-A109-BEA73DD8D1E1.png

    I have seen and avoided his wares. I really hate how the hole, massive rim dent, etc is always cropped out of the first picture.

    He buys some of my culls from me. For what I believe to be strong prices. I don’t know how he makes money. But I guess he does.
     
    C-B-D likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page