Is this a true 55 double die obverse and reverse

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Mattellis, Oct 27, 2021.

?

Just wanted some opinions

  1. It's the real deal

    1 vote(s)
    5.0%
  2. It's not the real deal

    19 vote(s)
    95.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Mattellis

    Mattellis Active Member

    Was wanting a few opinions,
    And maybe a lil insight
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Oct 27, 2021
    Mr.Q, TonkawaBill and SensibleSal66 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    th.jpg Pics are a little blurry but in my opinion : Machine doubling . ;)
    Here's "The Real Deal" .
     
  4. Mattellis

    Mattellis Active Member

     
    TonkawaBill likes this.
  5. Mattellis

    Mattellis Active Member

    I'll try to get some more clear shots for you all
     
    TonkawaBill likes this.
  6. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

  7. paddyman98

    paddyman98 Let me burst your bubble! Supporter

    No need to do that.
    Your date is clear. It is just Die Deterioration doubling. Not a true Doubled Die

    The correct numismatic terminology is Doubled Die.
    Not double die.
     
  8. Mattellis

    Mattellis Active Member

    Thanks
     
  9. Mattellis

    Mattellis Active Member

    Check out reverse
     
    TonkawaBill likes this.
  10. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

  11. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    100% nope.

    Not a DDO
     
    TonkawaBill likes this.
  12. TonkawaBill

    TonkawaBill Well-Known Member

    Noope
     
  13. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity Supporter

    Get yourself a Yeoman Red Book. The “real deal” is featured prominently in the wheat ear section. @Mattellis

    And, you’ve got work to do on in-focus close-ups. @SensibleSal66 provided the pics for the true variety everyone looks for and wants, but I disagree on the MD.

    Your lighting angle is highlighting the edges of the details (what remains), and IMO, that is mimicking machine doubling…I see no doubling on this coin, machine/mechanical or otherwise.

    There are many threads here on CT that you can find to improve your coin photography skills…Spark
     
    expat likes this.
  14. LaCointessa

    LaCointessa Supporter! Supporter

    @Mattellis - I have seen that called the "poor man's" version.
     
    Rick Stachowski and JCro57 like this.
  15. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Almost but no. It is also not a poorman. Sorry, thanks for the post, good luck.
     
  16. paddyman98

    paddyman98 Let me burst your bubble! Supporter

    I disagree. That would be a Poor Man's DD.
    See the deterioration issue to the right of the last 5?
    Capture+_2021-10-27-13-06-43.png
     
    LaCointessa, JCro57 and Mr.Q like this.
  17. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Sorry paddyman. Just my opinion. It may be a very poorman, but I wouldn't buy it. Thanks for the correction.
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  18. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity Supporter

    Yes, of course…hard to spot with the wear and blurries…Spark
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  19. Jeffjay

    Jeffjay Well-Known Member

    If you had one there would be no doubt.
     
  20. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Supporter! Supporter

    I only see a circulation worn cent.
     
  21. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    no need to
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page