Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Larry Moran, post: 550169, member: 4580&quot;]Yes, with the amount of luster showing, it would seem to be an EF.</p><p><br /></p><p>The scratches mentioned <u>appear</u> to be on the mylar in the 2x2 covering the coin&#039;s obverse.</p><p><br /></p><p>There is no return policy, but if you can buy it below melt, you may want to take a chance.&nbsp; Seller has perfect feedback.</p><p><br /></p><p><u>Positive:</u>&nbsp;&nbsp; In addition to some remaining luster, Liberty&#039;s hairline is impressive.&nbsp; Overall, there appear to be few other marks and the cheek may prove quite nice.&nbsp; Color is good.&nbsp; Wear appears even and coin seems very natural.&nbsp; It is genuine.&nbsp; ; )</p><p><br /></p><p><u>Negative</u>:&nbsp; There appears to be one nasty bagmark in the field ahead of Liberty&#039;s nose/eye. Also, I suspect you may find some crud in the lettering, mainly on the obverse.</p><p><br /></p><p>The main drawbacks I see are lack of a return policy and that the coin is quite common, even in EF.&nbsp; If you had a common coin in AU or UNC condition, I think it would be better in the long run.&nbsp; It will be understandable to all that you won&#039;t have AU&#039;s or UNC&#039;s in rare dates or varieties.&nbsp; Almost nobody does.&nbsp; : )[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in