Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;funkee, post: 1823372, member: 37925&quot;]Sadly no, but don&#039;t give up hope. I was actually looking for the inverted W 1957 at the time I found it. I had recently read the article of the 1935F inverted M discovery note, and spotted this in a lot on eBay. Had I not known about the possibility of an inverted M, I wouldn&#039;t have even looked twice.</p><p><br /></p><p>The eBay image was blurry, but the serial number was close enough to the other one known that I pulled the trigger on the lot.</p><p><br /></p><p>This was my note:</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://imageshack.us/a/img38/9871/invertedms.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Here&#039;s the lot image I picked it out from:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]299721[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>There are now 3 known, and all 3 fall into this&nbsp; range: W715 60001I - W715 80000I </p><p>(<a href="http://www.uspapermoney.info/survey/invm.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.uspapermoney.info/survey/invm.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.uspapermoney.info/survey/invm.html</a>)</p><p><br /></p><p>That&#039;s not to say other ranges weren&#039;t affected, but chances are pretty good it&#039;s confined to this range. The 1957 $1 inverted W is more widespread.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here&#039;s the image from the 3rd note discovered (not mine - courtesy of Numbers):</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]299722[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m not sure about how the 1st note was found. I believe Jess Lipka found it, per an article on numismaster.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in