Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Is there anything more macho than the emperor as VIRTVS?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 4558104, member: 19463"]There is one other thing that bothers me about reverse figures like the Virtus of Gallienus. How did some expert in the past determine that the intent of the die cutter was to show the emperor in all his pencil necked glory? We simply do not know. Was there a young boy hero of a battle that day who made the reverse of a coin but never was recorded in written history? For certain that one will never be proven and has a one in a million chance of being true but the fact remains that we, today, can not go too far saying who 'posed' for that reverse type. ...or was this just the work of an apprentice die cutter who should have found employment elsewhere. People seem to insist on complete labels on coins so we get names on statues when all we have is a standing figure of an uncertain person or rendition of a deity. These are not unretouched photographs admissible in court. They are an artist's rendition of a concept using the available skills for that medium. Certainly we have reverses that show the emperor's face well enough that we have reasonable certainty of the intent. This was not one of them.</p><p><br /></p><p>Yes, Virtus was a feminine noun and we have trouble accepting the idea of 'manliness' being a woman. Yes, some better examples of Virtus coins show a breast. Many show a figure that could be a soldier, Mars, Virtus (the woman) or the die cutter's pre-school age son dressed up for a party. We do what we can do with what we have but need to avoid getting too worked up over these assumed labels. </p><p><br /></p><p>I don't have great examples from Gallienus but this denarius of Septimius relatively certainly shows the face of Septimius. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1128391[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1128393[/ATTACH] </p><p>Is this standing figure certainly Caracalla, Septimius, 'the emperor', a priest or just a standing figure? We can label it as we choose. Just don't take your labels so seriously that you insist on everyone else seeing the same thing. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1128394[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 4558104, member: 19463"]There is one other thing that bothers me about reverse figures like the Virtus of Gallienus. How did some expert in the past determine that the intent of the die cutter was to show the emperor in all his pencil necked glory? We simply do not know. Was there a young boy hero of a battle that day who made the reverse of a coin but never was recorded in written history? For certain that one will never be proven and has a one in a million chance of being true but the fact remains that we, today, can not go too far saying who 'posed' for that reverse type. ...or was this just the work of an apprentice die cutter who should have found employment elsewhere. People seem to insist on complete labels on coins so we get names on statues when all we have is a standing figure of an uncertain person or rendition of a deity. These are not unretouched photographs admissible in court. They are an artist's rendition of a concept using the available skills for that medium. Certainly we have reverses that show the emperor's face well enough that we have reasonable certainty of the intent. This was not one of them. Yes, Virtus was a feminine noun and we have trouble accepting the idea of 'manliness' being a woman. Yes, some better examples of Virtus coins show a breast. Many show a figure that could be a soldier, Mars, Virtus (the woman) or the die cutter's pre-school age son dressed up for a party. We do what we can do with what we have but need to avoid getting too worked up over these assumed labels. I don't have great examples from Gallienus but this denarius of Septimius relatively certainly shows the face of Septimius. [ATTACH=full]1128391[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1128393[/ATTACH] Is this standing figure certainly Caracalla, Septimius, 'the emperor', a priest or just a standing figure? We can label it as we choose. Just don't take your labels so seriously that you insist on everyone else seeing the same thing. [ATTACH=full]1128394[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Is there anything more macho than the emperor as VIRTVS?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...