Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Paddy54, post: 8461557, member: 19250&quot;]Well where I went to school that is an &quot;S&quot; and yes they missed it .however check out mint mark styles....that doesn&#039;t look like a 1916 S more like the 1917 S</p><p>As the 16 S is not As tall as the 17 S.</p><p>&nbsp;.[ATTACH=full]1499310[/ATTACH]&nbsp; 17 S&nbsp; [ATTACH=full]1499311[/ATTACH] 16 S</p><p><br /></p><p>Which ia another reason I always check miht mark styles. That to my eye is the 17 - S mm which it may of been close to the end of the 1916 S run and a new mm style was used.</p><p>Another point of interest is mm placement.... not where the 16 S was placed...however look at the 17 S placement. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> as the 16 s was closer to the leaf..and the 17 S futher down the stem.</p><p><br /></p><p>You may have a new discovery?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in