Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Insider, post: 2596261, member: 24314&quot;]<span style="color: rgb(0, 89, 179)">Yes, a strong &quot;D&quot; is clearly visible.</span></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 89, 179)"><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie92" alt=":stop:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> IMO, Your post is nonsense <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie96" alt=":vomit:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> and you need to brush up on your grading skills.&nbsp; Professional graders way above our pay grade/skill level at one of the top two TPGS&#039;s have graded this coin <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0)">ALMOST MS-64!&nbsp; <span style="color: rgb(0, 89, 179)">There is nothing &quot;scrapped off that coin with full mint luster and very few marks and great eye appeal. That is fact not opinion. </span> </span></span></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <span style="color: #0059b3">See above.&nbsp; You <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie26" alt=":bookworm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> are a collector of this series.&nbsp; I know this coin is not</span> <b>heavily discolored and <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0)">very ugly</span></b><span style="color: #0059b3">; but it is <span style="color: #b300b3">not damaged</span>.&nbsp; many of this date were struck with worn dies (See previous post).&nbsp; The die wear is chiefly around and near the rim.&nbsp; That&#039;s why it cuts through the area where the &quot;D&quot; mint mark is.&nbsp; The coin in the OP is genuine.</span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in