Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;AWORDCREATED, post: 1772197, member: 52245&quot;]It was.&nbsp; And well received and liked to boot!</p><p><br /></p><p>I knew I could get you guys goin&#039;.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now, to say what:&nbsp; Coins in general, not a particular coin at this time...picture any coin you like in your mind for this analysis.&nbsp; Is the field itself considered an icusive item, since it does push metal down and out of the way.&nbsp; As a frame of reference I think of it as being neutral, or zero elevation, but that might not be the true case in terms of &#039;average surface depth&#039; .&nbsp; For example a coin with may devices will probably have an average surface elevation above the field, and vice versa.&nbsp; In the former case the field itself is technically an incusive detail, right?&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Many incusive details appear on/in other larger raised details.&nbsp; Where do we draw that line?</p><p><br /></p><p>There might be implications.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in