Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is the 1916 Standing Liberty quarter "obscene"?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Owle, post: 1426375, member: 22004"]I found a copy of Breen's coin encyclopedia where I believe he went into Comstock's role as a censor. Tangling with Saint-Gaudens was most unfortunate, with how top notch SG was. </p><p><br /></p><p>In 1892 with the Pan-Pac expostion the great sculptor had a contract to help with the designs then. Here is how one numismatic company described it:</p><p><br /></p><p>"In 1892, Saint-Gaudens was asked to design the official medal of the World Columbian Exposition in Chicago; it would be presented to prizewinning exhibitors. The obverse of Saint-Gaudens’s design, showing Columbus coming ashore, was noncontroversial; his reverse, which featured a torch-bearing naked youth carrying wreaths to crown the victors, was attacked by the censoring postal agent, Anthony Comstock, as obscene. The exposition directors hastily withdrew the reverse design and replaced it with one created by Barber which, according to numismatic historian Walter Breen, was “notable only for banality”. A furious Saint-Gaudens swore to have nothing more to do with the Mint or its employees, and for the next decade refused all commissions which might involve him with that bureau."</p><p><a href="http://premiercoingalleries.com/background-history-of-saint-gaudens-gold-coin/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://premiercoingalleries.com/background-history-of-saint-gaudens-gold-coin/" rel="nofollow">http://premiercoingalleries.com/background-history-of-saint-gaudens-gold-coin/</a></p><p><br /></p><p>I would agree that the classical designs harkening back to ancient Greece was not inappropriate as long as they did not cross the line. This is the old Hellenism-Hebraism divide that Matthew Arnold discusses in his essays, "Culture and Anarchy". The first culture prized beauty and creativity for its own sake; the latter valued action and accomplishment and 'family values" for lack of a better term. Comstock was an embodiment of the latter.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Owle, post: 1426375, member: 22004"]I found a copy of Breen's coin encyclopedia where I believe he went into Comstock's role as a censor. Tangling with Saint-Gaudens was most unfortunate, with how top notch SG was. In 1892 with the Pan-Pac expostion the great sculptor had a contract to help with the designs then. Here is how one numismatic company described it: "In 1892, Saint-Gaudens was asked to design the official medal of the World Columbian Exposition in Chicago; it would be presented to prizewinning exhibitors. The obverse of Saint-Gaudens’s design, showing Columbus coming ashore, was noncontroversial; his reverse, which featured a torch-bearing naked youth carrying wreaths to crown the victors, was attacked by the censoring postal agent, Anthony Comstock, as obscene. The exposition directors hastily withdrew the reverse design and replaced it with one created by Barber which, according to numismatic historian Walter Breen, was “notable only for banality”. A furious Saint-Gaudens swore to have nothing more to do with the Mint or its employees, and for the next decade refused all commissions which might involve him with that bureau." [URL]http://premiercoingalleries.com/background-history-of-saint-gaudens-gold-coin/[/URL] I would agree that the classical designs harkening back to ancient Greece was not inappropriate as long as they did not cross the line. This is the old Hellenism-Hebraism divide that Matthew Arnold discusses in his essays, "Culture and Anarchy". The first culture prized beauty and creativity for its own sake; the latter valued action and accomplishment and 'family values" for lack of a better term. Comstock was an embodiment of the latter.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is the 1916 Standing Liberty quarter "obscene"?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...