Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;CrustyCoins, post: 654435, member: 19115&quot;]Depends on who you talk to.</p><p><br /></p><p>My take on PCGS is they do little to the grade based on toning and takes mostly the technical merits. And sometimes even detract from the grade if they cannot determine how the surfaces are under the toning.</p><p><br /></p><p>My take on NGC is they originally did the above and created the * program to show great eye appeal but later it seems that they sometimes give an unwarranted grade bump for eye appeal and give it a *.</p><p><br /></p><p>Just my 2C and I can&#039;t back any of this up with proof.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in