Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="John Burgess, post: 5246789, member: 105098"]This link may help in understanding what went on here.<a href="http://varietyvista.com/25%20What%20Are%20Die%20Varieties/Lincoln%20Cent%20Memorial%20RDV%20Changes.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://varietyvista.com/25%20What%20Are%20Die%20Varieties/Lincoln%20Cent%20Memorial%20RDV%20Changes.htm" rel="nofollow">http://varietyvista.com/25 What Are Die Varieties/Lincoln Cent Memorial RDV Changes.htm</a> it's variety vista, it's reverse die varieties.Either way variety vista is a good resource of information. over the years on memorial cents they changed the design of the reverse slightly. This also happened on the Obverse from time to time, but that's another story, if you want to look at those, look up "Lincoln cent ODVs" on the same variety vista website. Anyways, in the "transition years" where a switch to the newer die style happened, the errors occurred with the wide or close AM, the wrong die was used,  Like in the case of the 1992 Close AM, RDV-007 was used for some but it should have still been RDV-006.With the Wide AM's of 1998,1999, 2000, they used RVD-006 and was supposed to be using RVD-007.[/QUOTE]