Is my Mercury Dime 1941 Proof or Regular strike? HELP!

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Coinismatics2000, Feb 5, 2024.

?

Proof or Regular Strike Dime?

This poll will close on Jun 19, 2025 at 6:13 AM.
  1. Proof

  2. Regular

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Is my Mercury Dime 1941 Proof or Regular strike?

    From what I have read this could well be a proof example:
    • The details are extremely prominent and the strike is sharp.
    • There is a mirrored, reflective quality to the coin.
    • The year and mint allow for a proof version of this to exist (1941 Philadelphia Mint).
    • It has been protected in a plastic wallet for a long time which I dare not open.
    However, I am hesitant to conclude this is a proof strike because:
    • American coinage is not my expertise.
    • The 'business strike' mintage for this year is a huge 175 million vs a small 16 thousand proof coins. Odds are I could have a nice, regular dime.
    Any help and advice is appreciated. Should this be proof, I think I will get it graded.

    20240204_180404 (1).jpg 20240204_180404 (1).jpg 20240205_100302.jpg 20240205_100340.jpg 20240205_100331.jpg 20240205_100317.jpg 20240204_180404 (1).jpg 20240204_180352 (1).jpg 20240205_100302.jpg 20240205_100331.jpg 20240205_100340.jpg 20240205_100317.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Hello and Welcome to CoinTalk! Must have missed you Friday. This is a very well struck (Mint State) dime! I wish you could carefully remove it from the flip. It appears to be and I'm quite certain, a normal business strike. Awaiting more comments...... biggrin.gif
     
    lardan and Coinismatics2000 like this.
  4. Cheers for the welcome SensibleSal and thanks for the input!
    May I ask what leads you to believe it to be a business strike, please? Is there a telltale sign I am missing? I hope to learn!
    Thank you.
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  5. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Welcome to CT.
    Proofs show much more detail and will have mirror like fields. Once you look at a few it becomes easy to spot the difference.
     
    Mr.Q, Heavymetal, eddiespin and 2 others like this.
  6. Joshua Lemons

    Joshua Lemons Well-Known Member Supporter

    It's nearly impossible to confuse the proof from business strikes. Some things, as mentioned, come with looking at tons of coins.
     
  7. Noted - thank you for clearing this up for me.
     
  8. nwfdub

    nwfdub Member

    I disagree. I have been looking at coins for decades, and I still can't tell. I think some people just don’t see things the same as others. I have an astigmatism. I have difficulty seeing those hidden images posters as well. I mark every (non-moderen)proof I own. Otherwise they look the same as a cleaned coin to me. That's also why I don't play the grading game, or see red or red brown in a cent.
     
    Coinismatics2000 likes this.
  9. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Business strike. Welcome to CT, good luck, and keep posting. Nice Coin.
     
    Coinismatics2000 likes this.
  10. Cheers Mr.Q. Thank you for interacting with the post.
     
  11. Jersey magic man

    Jersey magic man Supporter! Supporter

    You should really remove the coin from the plastic envelope before taking a photograph. It will show us more details and eliminate reflections. In this case I would agree with a business strike due to the lack of the mirror like surface that is indicative of a proof strike.
     
    Coinismatics2000 likes this.
  12. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Not a proof by any means but it is a very well struck coin.
     
    lardan and Coinismatics2000 like this.
  13. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    As the others have said it's not a Proof. And I think there is a strong probability that the obv of the coin has been harshly cleaned.
     
  14. whilst I agree it is not proof (courtesy of this feed), is it possible that the 'harsh cleaning' on the Obverse is due to the old flip it is stored in and my subpar photography?
    To me, the obverse looks practically mint state and therefor untouched.
     
  15. Heavymetal

    Heavymetal Well-Known Member

    That ‘plastic wallet’ might not be all that protective. For sure a hole at the staple. And then there’s the staple itself.
    If this coin is really high quality it deserves a decent 2x2 at least. And we hope you’ll take some more good pictures while it breathes freedom for awhile
     
    Coinismatics2000 likes this.
  16. Your wish is my command - upgrading the flip and will be taking some better pictures. Cheers.
     
    Heavymetal likes this.
  17. lardan

    lardan Supporter! Supporter

    I don't collect these, but one can easily realize this is an excellent strike. Once is photographed out of the plastic I think a better determination can be made on the cleaning. It is still an excellent looking coin. and I hope for yoou it has not been cleaned.

    Welcome to Coin Talk!
     
    Coinismatics2000 likes this.
  18. New images here taken under 3 differing lights. This is also at 10x magnification. 20240205_173033.jpg 20240205_173044.jpg 20240205_173135.jpg 20240205_173142.jpg 20240205_173126.jpg 20240205_173119.jpg
     
    Heavymetal and Spark1951 like this.
  19. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    Very nice mercury/Liberty. MS65=$23, MS66=$36 (NumisMedia)…not valuable enough for TPG but encapsulation is definitely in order.

    Your most recent pics show the surface very clearly and confirm it is a business strike…imo…Spark
     
    Coinismatics2000 likes this.
  20. Thanks for the comment Spark - noted!
     
  21. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    Nice coin but definitely a business strike. In addition to all the other comments supporting BS, note that the center horizontal band on the reverse is not separated.
     
    ZoidMeister and Coinismatics2000 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page