Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Gam3rBlake, post: 5319790, member: 115909&quot;]First of all it doesn’t matter if it took 100 years.</p><p><br /></p><p>Secondly: It was never only worth 10 cents. Even back in the early 1900s coin collectors would’ve paid much more than that with such a limited mintage.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thirdly: I never said we should go after the Mint workers. I just believe those coins should be confiscated.</p><p><br /></p><p>Fourthly: If we allow this whats to stop Mint employees today from purposely making very small numbers of unique coins and then selling them?</p><p><br /></p><ul> <li>There is a <b>huge </b>difference between releasing coins with low mintages and making small numbers of coins that the public doesn’t even have a chance to get. With 1916-D dimes &amp; 1913-S quarters at least the public had a chance to get them. They actually went into public circulation. <br /> <br /> </li> <li>These dimes were minted just for a high ranking US Mint employee who knew full well that by giving it to his daughter he was essentially funding her retirement for the low cost of $0.10.</li> </ul><p><br /></p><p>Are you saying you would be okay with Mint workers making say 10x 2020 Morgan Dollars and then selling them to the public for $1.5 million each knowing Morgan Dollar collectors would pay a fortune?</p><p><br /></p><p>Or why not just have the Mint start making old vintage coins with a CC on them?</p><p><br /></p><p>Or better yet why not just let the Mint take 1000 oz of silver and Mint it into 1000x 1893 S Morgan Dollars?</p><p><br /></p><p>Face it: If the story is true it means whoever made them committed fraud and their descendants should not profit off of fraud.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in