Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is it time to focus on clad coinage?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="cladking, post: 1260196, member: 68"]Outside of just a very few dates almost no pre-'98 clads were saved. </p><p><br /></p><p>People saved som kennedy and ike coins and bicentennial quarters and very little else. Even the coins that were saved are often gone now because common wisdom is that all of these are common. If not for mint sets most of these coins would be scarce or rare. </p><p><br /></p><p>But if you look at the mint sets closely you'll see they don't really change the equation that much. For instance every '68-P cent in mint sets is corroded! Most mint sets have been cut up and the coins spent. Many moderns don't appear in mint sets at all. Almost no varieties appear in mint sets and this means almost all modern varieties are scarce or rare. They made 100,000 1972-D type "b' reverse quarters and there probably aren't even ten of them in unc, and maybe much fewer. They made a few million '85-P sm bust quarters and I'd wager there aren't 50 in Unc. There won't be any in AU or XF and if people don't start looking then there won't be any in VF either. </p><p><br /></p><p>You claim a 1969 quarter is common but the facts argue otherwise. Sure it was common in 1969 but these coins were not saved!!! The mint sets have been torn apart. There are no rolls and no bags. Even if there were bags and bags of these the odds are there wouldn't be a single nice specimen in all of them because this date had severe problems. The few coins surviving in mint sets have severe problems for the main part. </p><p><br /></p><p>Let me say this again. There are 2,000,000 nice attractive 1950-D nickels but there aren't even 100,000 nice attractive '69 quarters or 10,000 1982-P quarters. That makes the moderns orders of magnitude scarcer than a coin that got up close to $200 in todays money. </p><p><br /></p><p>You can claim the moderns are common but it simply isn't true. </p><p><br /></p><p>As I also pointed out earlier the Russian coins were made in huge numbers just like US coins and they made mint sets as well. A nice attractive 1969 5k sells for close to $1000 now. Are you suggesting that Russian coins made in the hundreds of millions are rare but our coins which are almost equally despised are common? </p><p><br /></p><p>It's the same thing all over the world; moderns weren't saved because they had no silver and they were made in huge numbers. Now a very tiny number of collectors are seeking them out and are finding many of them (like a '69 5k) are simply unavailable. What will happen if large numbers of collectors beigin looking at moderns.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="cladking, post: 1260196, member: 68"]Outside of just a very few dates almost no pre-'98 clads were saved. People saved som kennedy and ike coins and bicentennial quarters and very little else. Even the coins that were saved are often gone now because common wisdom is that all of these are common. If not for mint sets most of these coins would be scarce or rare. But if you look at the mint sets closely you'll see they don't really change the equation that much. For instance every '68-P cent in mint sets is corroded! Most mint sets have been cut up and the coins spent. Many moderns don't appear in mint sets at all. Almost no varieties appear in mint sets and this means almost all modern varieties are scarce or rare. They made 100,000 1972-D type "b' reverse quarters and there probably aren't even ten of them in unc, and maybe much fewer. They made a few million '85-P sm bust quarters and I'd wager there aren't 50 in Unc. There won't be any in AU or XF and if people don't start looking then there won't be any in VF either. You claim a 1969 quarter is common but the facts argue otherwise. Sure it was common in 1969 but these coins were not saved!!! The mint sets have been torn apart. There are no rolls and no bags. Even if there were bags and bags of these the odds are there wouldn't be a single nice specimen in all of them because this date had severe problems. The few coins surviving in mint sets have severe problems for the main part. Let me say this again. There are 2,000,000 nice attractive 1950-D nickels but there aren't even 100,000 nice attractive '69 quarters or 10,000 1982-P quarters. That makes the moderns orders of magnitude scarcer than a coin that got up close to $200 in todays money. You can claim the moderns are common but it simply isn't true. As I also pointed out earlier the Russian coins were made in huge numbers just like US coins and they made mint sets as well. A nice attractive 1969 5k sells for close to $1000 now. Are you suggesting that Russian coins made in the hundreds of millions are rare but our coins which are almost equally despised are common? It's the same thing all over the world; moderns weren't saved because they had no silver and they were made in huge numbers. Now a very tiny number of collectors are seeking them out and are finding many of them (like a '69 5k) are simply unavailable. What will happen if large numbers of collectors beigin looking at moderns.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is it time to focus on clad coinage?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...