Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Is it really possible that only PCGS and NGC get it right?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="messydesk, post: 2305892, member: 1765"]A coin can have a weak strike and grade MS63, or even 64. It depends for what is typical for the date and mint, and in some cases the die pair. This is from the David Lawrence Seated Half book:</p><p><br /></p><blockquote><p>Many of these coins are weakly struck, most have dramatically cracked die states, and a few have been found with bits of iron imbedded in the planchets. All these demonstrate the early minting problems of this new branch mint. This date is probably one of the most interesting to study: this is the only year with very small and small mintmark sizes, there are a variety of edge collars used (and consequently reed counts), and there are four major varieties.</p><p><br /></p><p>As seen on davidlawrence.com | <a href="https://www.davidlawrence.com/books/the-complete-guide-to-liberty-seated-half-dollars/chapter-6/date-by-date/1840-o/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.davidlawrence.com/books/the-complete-guide-to-liberty-seated-half-dollars/chapter-6/date-by-date/1840-o/" rel="nofollow">https://www.davidlawrence.com/books/the-complete-guide-to-liberty-seated-half-dollars/chapter-6/date-by-date/1840-o/</a></p><p><br /></p></blockquote><p>The pictures shown in the book show the WB-104 (Large O) as having a weak strike that matches the NGC coin shown. The indication of a weak strike being typical for 40-O tells me that the PCGS coin has an above average strike. From what I can see of the two coins, I like the PCGS 62 better than the NGC 63.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="messydesk, post: 2305892, member: 1765"]A coin can have a weak strike and grade MS63, or even 64. It depends for what is typical for the date and mint, and in some cases the die pair. This is from the David Lawrence Seated Half book: [INDENT]Many of these coins are weakly struck, most have dramatically cracked die states, and a few have been found with bits of iron imbedded in the planchets. All these demonstrate the early minting problems of this new branch mint. This date is probably one of the most interesting to study: this is the only year with very small and small mintmark sizes, there are a variety of edge collars used (and consequently reed counts), and there are four major varieties. As seen on davidlawrence.com | [url]https://www.davidlawrence.com/books/the-complete-guide-to-liberty-seated-half-dollars/chapter-6/date-by-date/1840-o/[/url] [/INDENT] The pictures shown in the book show the WB-104 (Large O) as having a weak strike that matches the NGC coin shown. The indication of a weak strike being typical for 40-O tells me that the PCGS coin has an above average strike. From what I can see of the two coins, I like the PCGS 62 better than the NGC 63.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Is it really possible that only PCGS and NGC get it right?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...