Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Is it really possible that only PCGS and NGC get it right?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="David Setree Rare Coins, post: 2279717, member: 74719"]Some of the confusion with grading is in understanding what is meant by "Grading"</p><p><br /></p><p>In my youth, all grading was of the "technical" sort. The amount of wear that the coin has received since it was minted determines the grade.</p><p><br /></p><p>Then came what is called "Market" grading or "price" grading. In this, the amount of wear is secondary to what the "market" would except for that type and era of coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>For example" I had an 1812 $5 gold piece that was fully struck, free of contact marks and with an original "skin". It had a very slight amount of wear, really just breaks in the luster on the extreme high points. I told the seller that it was somewhere between an AU55 and an MS63, depending on which graders where working that day and whether they got-----well--never mind about that.</p><p><br /></p><p>He was firm on his price and I took a gamble and bought it raw.</p><p><br /></p><p>It came back MS62.</p><p><br /></p><p>The graders obviously thought that the coin was very attractive and believed that, even though there was some wear on the coin, that it was worth what an MS62 would be on the market.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now I am sure I have really confused our newer friends![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="David Setree Rare Coins, post: 2279717, member: 74719"]Some of the confusion with grading is in understanding what is meant by "Grading" In my youth, all grading was of the "technical" sort. The amount of wear that the coin has received since it was minted determines the grade. Then came what is called "Market" grading or "price" grading. In this, the amount of wear is secondary to what the "market" would except for that type and era of coin. For example" I had an 1812 $5 gold piece that was fully struck, free of contact marks and with an original "skin". It had a very slight amount of wear, really just breaks in the luster on the extreme high points. I told the seller that it was somewhere between an AU55 and an MS63, depending on which graders where working that day and whether they got-----well--never mind about that. He was firm on his price and I took a gamble and bought it raw. It came back MS62. The graders obviously thought that the coin was very attractive and believed that, even though there was some wear on the coin, that it was worth what an MS62 would be on the market. Now I am sure I have really confused our newer friends![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Is it really possible that only PCGS and NGC get it right?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...