Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Jim Robinson, post: 2278487, member: 117134&quot;]Have you ever stopped to ask yourself the question: How is it possible that the very experienced numistmatists at both Anacs and ICG routinely get it wrong? Or do they? </p><p>Their slabs are treated virtually as raw.&nbsp; I don&#039;t get it.&nbsp; I know, I know, someone will say it&#039;s about the different &quot;standards&quot; utilized and developed by the top two. But, are they not all supposed to grade by the official ANA Grading Standards? </p><p>When I look at the credentials of the managing principals at Anacs and Icg, I for one feel like their grades should be proper.&nbsp; What gives?&nbsp; Do they grade accurately for the grade but forget to add ultra conservative developed standards employed as part of the top tiers business plan?&nbsp;&nbsp; Does the official ANA grading standards really have anything to do with assigned grade on each TPG?&nbsp; </p><p>Or is it something more sinister?&nbsp; A media monopoly?&nbsp; A carefully planned snubbing.&nbsp; Somebody help me here!</p><p><br /></p><p>Cross over successes and failures.&nbsp; Please post.&nbsp;&nbsp; I&#039;d love to here.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in