Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Gam3rBlake, post: 8037896, member: 115909&quot;]I wasn’t counting the pre-screened ones.</p><p><br /></p><p>You’re right they do cherry-pick the 70s. That’s why the population report says that <i>all of them </i>are 70s.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1392122[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>But I was talking about the normal submissions from non-dealer people who bought them from the Mint like I did.</p><p><br /></p><p>I could’ve sworn I read somewhere when I was reading everything about submissions that it said somewhere that I was not allowed to pick MS/PF 70 as a minimum grade. Maybe they let dealers do that but idk or not.</p><p><br /></p><p>Even so I can’t imagine not getting a few 70s out of 18 coins total. </p><p><br /></p><p>Before I sent them in I spent about 10 minutes per coin looking through a loupe and trying to find any sort of blemish or weak strike or anything that would make the coin obviously not a 70.</p><p><br /></p><p>To my great surprise I couldn’t find anything. Usually I can with things like ASEs (especially proofs) like with my v75 I chose not to send it in because it had a teeny tiny hairline scratch above the privy mark.</p><p><br /></p><p>I thought I found a tiny blemish on one of the S mintmark Morgans but it was just a speck of dust.</p><p><br /></p><p>That’s why I think they were well minted and struck well. Because I was impressed to not be able to find anything wrong.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in