Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is it normal for a proof bicentennial ike to be missing its cameo?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1641190, member: 42773"]Not from the 70's, no. Lots of the proofs have no cameo at all. It depends on the die state - the younger the die, the more cameo contrast. But I think there are other factors involved that someone like Doug and others could explain.</p><p><br /></p><p>Newer proofs use all kinds of Star Trek technology to get the cameos, so all the coins get them.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1641190, member: 42773"]Not from the 70's, no. Lots of the proofs have no cameo at all. It depends on the die state - the younger the die, the more cameo contrast. But I think there are other factors involved that someone like Doug and others could explain. Newer proofs use all kinds of Star Trek technology to get the cameos, so all the coins get them.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is it normal for a proof bicentennial ike to be missing its cameo?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...