Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;krispy, post: 1090645, member: 19065&quot;]I think it&#039;s safer to err on the side of &#039;illegal to own&#039; unless <i>officially</i> released by the BEP or canceled in some manner. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crane_%26_Co." target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crane_%26_Co." rel="nofollow">Cranes</a> guards <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cr3vvya9c-0&amp;feature=related" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cr3vvya9c-0&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">the paper</a> pretty darn seriously since they build a lot into the paper by the time its ready for delivery. Delivery to the BEP has to be secure as well because <a href="http://news.cnet.com/2300-11386_3-10003957-2.html?tag=mncol" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://news.cnet.com/2300-11386_3-10003957-2.html?tag=mncol" rel="nofollow">security features are already embedded</a> into the paper itself, prior to printing. I can&#039;t imagine the Treasury/BEP want&#039;s to find out there are unprinted sheets, especially trimmed to finished bank note size exiting their facilities and floating around.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in