Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is ICG really as bad as many people say?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 5207653, member: 24314"]Now for the 1909-S cent. This is a tough one and I can defend (in a courtroom) any grade from AU-58 to MS-65+! It is a coin I would not buy for my personal collection because there is obvious "rub" on the obverse high points. The old "<b>technical" grade</b> for this would have been <b>Choice</b> (no flaws, beautiful luster) <b>AU</b> ("cabinet friction" <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />)</p><p><br /></p><p>The <b>commercial grade</b> would easily be <b>MS </b>both back then and today<b>. Now the problem:</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Today, our old AU's are virtually always found in MS holders. IMO, today this coin would be <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">very strictly</span>, commercial graded as MS-62 due to the rub. However, the coin "looks like" a coin with a minimum commercial grade of MS-64 when judged with other coins in the market. You'll never be able to buy a coin as this for less than 64 or 65 money. If I <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie47" alt=":greedy:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> were a successful coin dealer, I would sell it "raw" as an MS-65; or get it crossed into probably a PCGS/NGC MS-64. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie12" alt="o_O" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>PS I don't like the color of the reverse so this could be a trick question showing an MS "details" coin. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie7" alt=":p" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 5207653, member: 24314"]Now for the 1909-S cent. This is a tough one and I can defend (in a courtroom) any grade from AU-58 to MS-65+! It is a coin I would not buy for my personal collection because there is obvious "rub" on the obverse high points. The old "[B]technical" grade[/B] for this would have been [B]Choice[/B] (no flaws, beautiful luster) [B]AU[/B] ("cabinet friction" :D) The [B]commercial grade[/B] would easily be [B]MS [/B]both back then and today[B]. Now the problem:[/B] Today, our old AU's are virtually always found in MS holders. IMO, today this coin would be [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]very strictly[/COLOR], commercial graded as MS-62 due to the rub. However, the coin "looks like" a coin with a minimum commercial grade of MS-64 when judged with other coins in the market. You'll never be able to buy a coin as this for less than 64 or 65 money. If I :greedy: were a successful coin dealer, I would sell it "raw" as an MS-65; or get it crossed into probably a PCGS/NGC MS-64. o_O PS I don't like the color of the reverse so this could be a trick question showing an MS "details" coin. :p[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is ICG really as bad as many people say?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...