Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is ICG really as bad as many people say?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Bob Evancho, post: 5190358, member: 84595"]Does any knowledgeable collector really buy a coin because of the TPG holder it is in? I keep checking eBay for 1878 VAM 44 coins. There are two currently, one PCGS 61 and one NGC 61. I wish I had those two coins to show and compare them with my ICG 61 graded and encapsulated VAM 44A. I wish I could take good pictures as comparison (hope ICG did) because the NGC 61 is horrible with much chatter in the fields in front of Liberty's face and flatness above the ear (looks worse than my SEGS encapsulated 44A AU-58 details cleaned). The PCGS 61 coin has some scratches in the field in front of Liberty's face and a deeper scratch above the ear and rub on the cheek. In my honest opinion, my ICG 61 has better eye appeal, much less chatter and much less marks than either PCGS or NGC graded coins. Also I looked at my May 8, 2015 CDN and noticed that the HIGH for PCGS was 91.25% and NGC was 90.68% and the ICG HIGH was 95.24%. Since I am a collector (65 years), I buy the coin and not the holder. So to me, ICG is not as bad as many people say.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Bob Evancho, post: 5190358, member: 84595"]Does any knowledgeable collector really buy a coin because of the TPG holder it is in? I keep checking eBay for 1878 VAM 44 coins. There are two currently, one PCGS 61 and one NGC 61. I wish I had those two coins to show and compare them with my ICG 61 graded and encapsulated VAM 44A. I wish I could take good pictures as comparison (hope ICG did) because the NGC 61 is horrible with much chatter in the fields in front of Liberty's face and flatness above the ear (looks worse than my SEGS encapsulated 44A AU-58 details cleaned). The PCGS 61 coin has some scratches in the field in front of Liberty's face and a deeper scratch above the ear and rub on the cheek. In my honest opinion, my ICG 61 has better eye appeal, much less chatter and much less marks than either PCGS or NGC graded coins. Also I looked at my May 8, 2015 CDN and noticed that the HIGH for PCGS was 91.25% and NGC was 90.68% and the ICG HIGH was 95.24%. Since I am a collector (65 years), I buy the coin and not the holder. So to me, ICG is not as bad as many people say.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is ICG really as bad as many people say?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...