Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is ICG really as bad as many people say?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 5172166, member: 15309"]That depends, if you plan to sell the coins as raw coins, then yes, they are a poor investment.</p><p><br /></p><p>People have it in their head that TPG grading increases the value of the coin. That is false, what TPG grading does is increase the liquidity of the coin. Most collectors are unwilling to pay the full price of a raw coin because they know that they won't be able to sell that coin at that price unless they get the coin graded. That leaves the experts who will also have no reason to give you full price for your coin because they know the collectors won't pay that price, leaving you with no customers. At that point, the seller of the raw coin has only two choices: have the coin graded in order to increase liquidity or lower the price to increase liquidity.</p><p><br /></p><p>Lets go back to the coin I illustrated earlier in this thread: 1938-S Jefferson Nickel ICG MS67.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/ff5xZEs.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/mKRGoQN.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>The eBay seller of this coin had it listed for $37.50. The greysheet for the 1938-S is $170 in MS67 and $22 in MS66. So why didn't this seller list the coin for MS67 money? The answer is because he knows that ICG graded coins have no liquidity at full price guide value. He knew that his best chance to maximize his return on that coin was to sell it at a reasonable premium to the MS66 price guide, thereby increasing the liquidity of the coin. However, it is still important to note that his coin wasn't purchased by a collector, it was purchased by an expert who knew that the coin was graded correctly by ICG and that it could be sent to NGC to achieve the same MS67 grade. That NGC holder then provided an increase in liquidity so that the coin could be sold at the MS67 grade.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now you made the statement earlier in this thread that ICG coins are considered raw coins by the market. I don't agree with that statement. If this coin was raw, you could reasonably sell it as a GEM BU coin and get MS65 money for it. Once you attempt to get premium gem money for a raw Jefferson Nickel, the liquidity disappears. As a raw coin, this coin would get $10. As an ICG coin, it achieved $37.50. As an NGC coin, it achieved $178. The coin stayed the same the entire time, but the liquidity threshold changes with the grading opinion. As a raw coin, the liquidity level is MS65. As an ICG MS67 the liquidity level is of a PQ MS66. And as an NGC MS67, the liquidity level is MS67. That isn't to say that if you wait long enough that you couldn't sell the coin raw at MS66 prices or even get someone to pay MS67 prices for the ICG MS67 slab, but when people sell their coins, typically, they don't want to wait months or years.</p><p><br /></p><p>So the question is if you want to increase the liquidity of your coins, which grading company provides you with the biggest increase in liquidity? Sometimes the answer to that question is NGC, other times the answer is PCGS, but the answer is almost never ICG.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 5172166, member: 15309"]That depends, if you plan to sell the coins as raw coins, then yes, they are a poor investment. People have it in their head that TPG grading increases the value of the coin. That is false, what TPG grading does is increase the liquidity of the coin. Most collectors are unwilling to pay the full price of a raw coin because they know that they won't be able to sell that coin at that price unless they get the coin graded. That leaves the experts who will also have no reason to give you full price for your coin because they know the collectors won't pay that price, leaving you with no customers. At that point, the seller of the raw coin has only two choices: have the coin graded in order to increase liquidity or lower the price to increase liquidity. Lets go back to the coin I illustrated earlier in this thread: 1938-S Jefferson Nickel ICG MS67. [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/ff5xZEs.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/mKRGoQN.jpg[/IMG] The eBay seller of this coin had it listed for $37.50. The greysheet for the 1938-S is $170 in MS67 and $22 in MS66. So why didn't this seller list the coin for MS67 money? The answer is because he knows that ICG graded coins have no liquidity at full price guide value. He knew that his best chance to maximize his return on that coin was to sell it at a reasonable premium to the MS66 price guide, thereby increasing the liquidity of the coin. However, it is still important to note that his coin wasn't purchased by a collector, it was purchased by an expert who knew that the coin was graded correctly by ICG and that it could be sent to NGC to achieve the same MS67 grade. That NGC holder then provided an increase in liquidity so that the coin could be sold at the MS67 grade. Now you made the statement earlier in this thread that ICG coins are considered raw coins by the market. I don't agree with that statement. If this coin was raw, you could reasonably sell it as a GEM BU coin and get MS65 money for it. Once you attempt to get premium gem money for a raw Jefferson Nickel, the liquidity disappears. As a raw coin, this coin would get $10. As an ICG coin, it achieved $37.50. As an NGC coin, it achieved $178. The coin stayed the same the entire time, but the liquidity threshold changes with the grading opinion. As a raw coin, the liquidity level is MS65. As an ICG MS67 the liquidity level is of a PQ MS66. And as an NGC MS67, the liquidity level is MS67. That isn't to say that if you wait long enough that you couldn't sell the coin raw at MS66 prices or even get someone to pay MS67 prices for the ICG MS67 slab, but when people sell their coins, typically, they don't want to wait months or years. So the question is if you want to increase the liquidity of your coins, which grading company provides you with the biggest increase in liquidity? Sometimes the answer to that question is NGC, other times the answer is PCGS, but the answer is almost never ICG.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is ICG really as bad as many people say?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...