Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is ICG really as bad as many people say?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="baseball21, post: 5149557, member: 76863"]There’s really a simple explanation to all of this. Say we hypothetically say grading is completely equal at all of them, so then what’s the separation? Well two are international companies with offices on multiple continents and two have a single office. Two have apps and two do not as far as I know. Two can go to CAC, two can not. </p><p><br /></p><p>Of the international two one has far more online resources and a modern webpage with many apps. More importantly they have a better optical holder that is not only water resistant underwater to an extent but scratch resistant, added security chips, has been innovative etc. The other has an okay webpage with an app or two, up charges for scratch resistant holders and basically same holder for a decade or so if not longer where just the labels change. </p><p><br /></p><p>I don’t have the energy to do any grading arguments and really just don’t care enough, but it’s clear why there’s a 1 then like a 1.5 then the rest and it’s clear whose best set up going forward to keep being the leader. Anyone whose expecting some drastic flip, that ship sailed a long time ago[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="baseball21, post: 5149557, member: 76863"]There’s really a simple explanation to all of this. Say we hypothetically say grading is completely equal at all of them, so then what’s the separation? Well two are international companies with offices on multiple continents and two have a single office. Two have apps and two do not as far as I know. Two can go to CAC, two can not. Of the international two one has far more online resources and a modern webpage with many apps. More importantly they have a better optical holder that is not only water resistant underwater to an extent but scratch resistant, added security chips, has been innovative etc. The other has an okay webpage with an app or two, up charges for scratch resistant holders and basically same holder for a decade or so if not longer where just the labels change. I don’t have the energy to do any grading arguments and really just don’t care enough, but it’s clear why there’s a 1 then like a 1.5 then the rest and it’s clear whose best set up going forward to keep being the leader. Anyone whose expecting some drastic flip, that ship sailed a long time ago[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is ICG really as bad as many people say?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...