Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;KSorbo, post: 5149468, member: 56370&quot;]I’ve always struggled with the comparisons between the major grading companies.&nbsp; In my opinion there is enough subjectivity in grading to make a truly scientific comparison impossible.&nbsp; At the end of the day I like PCGS because their holders look nice and everyone else seems to like them.&nbsp; When I see something in an ICG or ANACS holder that’s questionable, I really can’t say anything, because someone is going to show an example of something in a PCGS or NGC holder that’s even worse.&nbsp; Are ICG and ANACS really any looser in numerical grades or in identifying problem coins?</p><p><br /></p><p>Isn’t a lot of the industry consensus just confirmation bias?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in