Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is ICG really as bad as many people say?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="imrich, post: 3215027, member: 22331"]As part of a long term comparative study, I've been removing large lots of >$1500 valued coins from one of the top 2 TPG and submitting to their "peer". All coins submitted to NGC are sent to NCS first, as I'm frustrated with "surprises" (i.e. cleaned, etc.) from these firms, with a request to not forward if a "condition" is found. Previous lots were forwarded from NCS to receive a "condition" graded coin. The last lot had a previously straight grade MS62 Coronet Double Eagle returned Unc. Details, Scratch. Another MS66 fb micro S dime returned MS65 S, taking 3 submissions of NCS to NGC before recognizing the micro S, but never the completely separated "full bands".</p><p><br /></p><p>The current lot has so far been in process a ~month longer than normal, with no return in sight.</p><p><br /></p><p>I believe it really doesn't matter to whom you ask for grade certification, they all have "problems", as stated by others in this thread.</p><p><br /></p><p>I believe there's less accuracy than the grading study exposed by Coin World in their May 26, 2003 edition.</p><p><br /></p><p>The book "United States Large Cents" author says it best of "sellers": "<u>You never agree on grade</u>", but we agreed the coin graded $100. It's perceived that "Dealers" really don't care about accuracy of grade, as "Buyers" prefer accuracy, but both are concerned about relative pricing.</p><p><br /></p><p>JMHO[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="imrich, post: 3215027, member: 22331"]As part of a long term comparative study, I've been removing large lots of >$1500 valued coins from one of the top 2 TPG and submitting to their "peer". All coins submitted to NGC are sent to NCS first, as I'm frustrated with "surprises" (i.e. cleaned, etc.) from these firms, with a request to not forward if a "condition" is found. Previous lots were forwarded from NCS to receive a "condition" graded coin. The last lot had a previously straight grade MS62 Coronet Double Eagle returned Unc. Details, Scratch. Another MS66 fb micro S dime returned MS65 S, taking 3 submissions of NCS to NGC before recognizing the micro S, but never the completely separated "full bands". The current lot has so far been in process a ~month longer than normal, with no return in sight. I believe it really doesn't matter to whom you ask for grade certification, they all have "problems", as stated by others in this thread. I believe there's less accuracy than the grading study exposed by Coin World in their May 26, 2003 edition. The book "United States Large Cents" author says it best of "sellers": "[U]You never agree on grade[/U]", but we agreed the coin graded $100. It's perceived that "Dealers" really don't care about accuracy of grade, as "Buyers" prefer accuracy, but both are concerned about relative pricing. JMHO[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is ICG really as bad as many people say?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...