Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is ICG really as bad as many people say?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 3214009, member: 24314"]The graders - the long-time experienced ones at the major grading services are all good. They must grade to company standards. As for who's best...that's something you'll need to decide for yourself. As one member wrote, it's hard to beat a PCGS slab with a CAC sticker no matter what you think of the actual coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>One thing to consider is that some of the graders at the lower tier services have been on the job longer than the graders at the top two services. Coin grading has taken a very winding path since the 1970's that leads up to the present time. If I had to make a bet, I'd say the long-time graders at ICG and ANACS tend to be more old school as they were grading coins for years when the standards were much tighter. That's why IMO, most of you here would agree more often with the grade assigned to a coin by ICG or ANACS. </p><p><br /></p><p>There is also the # of coins graded a week that enters into the equation. Plus if any of you think that a very experienced professional grader is going to catch over 90% of the problems on a coin using their eyes or minimal magnification I have a bridge to sell you. That's why there is more than one person on a coin and stuff still is missed. Problem coins are straight graded because they are market acceptable and have eye-appeal. </p><p><br /></p><p>You should see the crap the big guys try and get past ICG. Dozens today alone valued in the four and five figures. Best example from today (I'm putting it in my Numismatic News column) was a Capped Bust 50c with very light toning that looked like an MS-64+ as I removed it from the flip. While I debated a 64 or 64+ I moved it onto the scope w/fluorescent light and BOOM! It had a fairly good repaired field that IMO would pass at least 80% of the collectors/dealers. It's the kind of coin that we get calls on. "I've shown this to four dealers and they don't see anything! LOL. So its a 3/4 natural "gem" and a 1/4 "trap" for the unknowing. How about naked eye </p><p>MS-66 looking Liberty gold - that is mark free yet lightly buffed in such a manner that 90% would miss it. These coins are in MS-64 slabs. I've warned folks before. Don't think you know more than the graders. Most of the time there is a reason that "perfect" coin is not graded higher.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 3214009, member: 24314"]The graders - the long-time experienced ones at the major grading services are all good. They must grade to company standards. As for who's best...that's something you'll need to decide for yourself. As one member wrote, it's hard to beat a PCGS slab with a CAC sticker no matter what you think of the actual coin. One thing to consider is that some of the graders at the lower tier services have been on the job longer than the graders at the top two services. Coin grading has taken a very winding path since the 1970's that leads up to the present time. If I had to make a bet, I'd say the long-time graders at ICG and ANACS tend to be more old school as they were grading coins for years when the standards were much tighter. That's why IMO, most of you here would agree more often with the grade assigned to a coin by ICG or ANACS. There is also the # of coins graded a week that enters into the equation. Plus if any of you think that a very experienced professional grader is going to catch over 90% of the problems on a coin using their eyes or minimal magnification I have a bridge to sell you. That's why there is more than one person on a coin and stuff still is missed. Problem coins are straight graded because they are market acceptable and have eye-appeal. You should see the crap the big guys try and get past ICG. Dozens today alone valued in the four and five figures. Best example from today (I'm putting it in my Numismatic News column) was a Capped Bust 50c with very light toning that looked like an MS-64+ as I removed it from the flip. While I debated a 64 or 64+ I moved it onto the scope w/fluorescent light and BOOM! It had a fairly good repaired field that IMO would pass at least 80% of the collectors/dealers. It's the kind of coin that we get calls on. "I've shown this to four dealers and they don't see anything! LOL. So its a 3/4 natural "gem" and a 1/4 "trap" for the unknowing. How about naked eye MS-66 looking Liberty gold - that is mark free yet lightly buffed in such a manner that 90% would miss it. These coins are in MS-64 slabs. I've warned folks before. Don't think you know more than the graders. Most of the time there is a reason that "perfect" coin is not graded higher.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is ICG really as bad as many people say?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...