Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Is Emmett now the standard reference on Alexandrian coins?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2753577, member: 19463"]And here is the problem with books. Authors and publishers have a silly desire to sell enough copies to break even on the project. Specialized numismatic books in 5 (or 50) volumes selling for a hundred dollars a volume tend to sell a few copies and rise in price when out of print producing a profit for people other than those who undertook the project. Emmett filled with 4000+ images of the coins would be easily 20 volumes the size of the current book. If we decided it as important to list separately all the legend variations even if we did not try to illustrate them we might double that count. Worst, the book lists a rather high number of R5 coins meaning that the listing was made from a single specimen or possibly two but some of these have not been seen since they were listed before many coins were photographed. The best possible book would not be anything approaching complete. Finding and photographing a second and third 1400 coins not in Forschner would be a lifelong quest. The book would be like the Oxford English Dictionary. Perhaps that is why they now issue the dictionary online and why the new works on Provincial coins, including Alexandrians seem likely to be online publications. Those of us who want photos can access then online. </p><p><br /></p><p>In 2002, we worked on the images for Victor Failmezger's <b>Late Roman Bronze Coins</b>. The author humored me by allowing production of the CDRom containing the images from the plates. I was of the opinion then that the book could have been made smaller and cheaper by omitting the color plates and relying on the CDRom. I was wrong. Relatively few people wanted the disk. Now, 15 years later, I still believe that the answer is softcopy images but now it is online rather than a CDRom. I am happy to see a project on Alexandrian coin images online not unlike the one available for RIC V part 1. They are working on it, in pieces. Perhaps more people now will decide that thousands of searchable online images is better than a paper page with a few hundred. </p><p><br /></p><p>Where does one buy Forschner? ...Geissen? I'd have to consider carefully just how many 300 euro books on Alexandrian coins I need.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2753577, member: 19463"]And here is the problem with books. Authors and publishers have a silly desire to sell enough copies to break even on the project. Specialized numismatic books in 5 (or 50) volumes selling for a hundred dollars a volume tend to sell a few copies and rise in price when out of print producing a profit for people other than those who undertook the project. Emmett filled with 4000+ images of the coins would be easily 20 volumes the size of the current book. If we decided it as important to list separately all the legend variations even if we did not try to illustrate them we might double that count. Worst, the book lists a rather high number of R5 coins meaning that the listing was made from a single specimen or possibly two but some of these have not been seen since they were listed before many coins were photographed. The best possible book would not be anything approaching complete. Finding and photographing a second and third 1400 coins not in Forschner would be a lifelong quest. The book would be like the Oxford English Dictionary. Perhaps that is why they now issue the dictionary online and why the new works on Provincial coins, including Alexandrians seem likely to be online publications. Those of us who want photos can access then online. In 2002, we worked on the images for Victor Failmezger's [B]Late Roman Bronze Coins[/B]. The author humored me by allowing production of the CDRom containing the images from the plates. I was of the opinion then that the book could have been made smaller and cheaper by omitting the color plates and relying on the CDRom. I was wrong. Relatively few people wanted the disk. Now, 15 years later, I still believe that the answer is softcopy images but now it is online rather than a CDRom. I am happy to see a project on Alexandrian coin images online not unlike the one available for RIC V part 1. They are working on it, in pieces. Perhaps more people now will decide that thousands of searchable online images is better than a paper page with a few hundred. Where does one buy Forschner? ...Geissen? I'd have to consider carefully just how many 300 euro books on Alexandrian coins I need.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Is Emmett now the standard reference on Alexandrian coins?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...