Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mac McDonald, post: 7494402, member: 117420&quot;]Maybe I&#039;m a bit confused by the answers...assuming I interpreted the question correctly <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie101" alt=":woot:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />...on whether ANACS was the best/better TPG company to use for varieties and errors.&nbsp; Seemed the answers were more to which/what varieties and errors, et al, that ANACS and the others would attribute, or if they would at all...and I thought he was wanting to know if ANACS would do the best/better job with their grading.&nbsp; Remember, they&#039;re going to grade the entire coin...they&#039;re only going to attribute the variety or error.&nbsp; To me, that&#039;s two different things.&nbsp; Easy to learn what each TPG will grade by just checking their websites...but not so easy to know if ANACS...or which other TPG...will better focus the right skill personnel, attention and time do the more accurate attribution for more of the &quot;little stuff&quot; (but still important to many).&nbsp; As long as most of the more common attributions are equal across TPG services, to me it&#039;s which one do you like best for grading.&nbsp; If it&#039;s something that only one TPG attributes, then gotta go with that one.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in