Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is AI "reading" and commenting on/rehashing some of our threads?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="samclemens3991, post: 26299391, member: 82181"]I am a mouth breathing idiot but my oldest daughter has advanced degrees as a librarian and in the field of Information Technology. Earlier this year she attended a symposium at De Paul university on AI. I will have to try and get her to let me read some of the things discussed there again. I will say this without reservation. 3 people who are credited with the invention of a current AI program were there.</p><p> I read the summary of discussion with those individuals and they had a long list of ways AI will make drastic effects on many things and hopefully in a good way. All 3 also listed a few things they felt they had done wrong. The first one was that they all set up their program to look for "The best possible answer." When I first read that I was confused. How can looking for the "best' answer be a mistake? It has to do with filters.</p><p> Here are a few assumptions all current AI programs are making. "People" are unreliable, emotional and can not be trusted to state facts clearly. Computers on the other hand are cold emotionless sources for facts. This means computers inherently accept any fact from another AI program as the absolute truth. The obvious problem is that since the vast majority of what AI programs do is seek out information their bedrock becomes derivitive. Currently if one AI program makes a faulty decision about a fact; all the AI programs are vulnerable to accepting false facts as truth.</p><p> The second problem is that all current AI programs have an almost built in tendency to think of themselves as infallible. they are suppose to do exstensive fact checking, but remember, if computers are suppose to always be right how can a fact accepted by other AI programs ever be wrong? They all felt that within the next 5 years all current AI programs would become too bug ridden to be useful. Or that the next generation of AI will have to be given better filters so they can fix these problems. </p><p> I give you fair warning. the person posting this has horrible tech skills but I do know how to read and that is what I came to understand. james[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="samclemens3991, post: 26299391, member: 82181"]I am a mouth breathing idiot but my oldest daughter has advanced degrees as a librarian and in the field of Information Technology. Earlier this year she attended a symposium at De Paul university on AI. I will have to try and get her to let me read some of the things discussed there again. I will say this without reservation. 3 people who are credited with the invention of a current AI program were there. I read the summary of discussion with those individuals and they had a long list of ways AI will make drastic effects on many things and hopefully in a good way. All 3 also listed a few things they felt they had done wrong. The first one was that they all set up their program to look for "The best possible answer." When I first read that I was confused. How can looking for the "best' answer be a mistake? It has to do with filters. Here are a few assumptions all current AI programs are making. "People" are unreliable, emotional and can not be trusted to state facts clearly. Computers on the other hand are cold emotionless sources for facts. This means computers inherently accept any fact from another AI program as the absolute truth. The obvious problem is that since the vast majority of what AI programs do is seek out information their bedrock becomes derivitive. Currently if one AI program makes a faulty decision about a fact; all the AI programs are vulnerable to accepting false facts as truth. The second problem is that all current AI programs have an almost built in tendency to think of themselves as infallible. they are suppose to do exstensive fact checking, but remember, if computers are suppose to always be right how can a fact accepted by other AI programs ever be wrong? They all felt that within the next 5 years all current AI programs would become too bug ridden to be useful. Or that the next generation of AI will have to be given better filters so they can fix these problems. I give you fair warning. the person posting this has horrible tech skills but I do know how to read and that is what I came to understand. james[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Is AI "reading" and commenting on/rehashing some of our threads?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...